On 17/09/08 at 20:39 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > That said, we have of course the choice between just having one tuple > per package, with a field containing all associated tags (e.g., > comma-separated), and having one tuple for each pair <package, tag>. > > I tend to prefer the latter, as we have already expressed relational > algebra the different tags for each package, without needing to resort > to sub-string machinery.
me too. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
