Hi, On Samstag, 18. April 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Looking at this list:
Thanks for the looking and doing a summary! :-) I just looked at the two open
bugs, was in a hurry and so I thought I'll just ask Ralf. Then I decided to
mail the list, as the question is probably of wider interest.
> - #285040 still applies, but the Policy (now 5.6.12) still says should.
Ah, I missed that it's a "should" and not a "must". I would have expected
a "must" :-)
On Sonntag, 19. April 2009, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Yes, I haven't seen any tools break because of these bugs.
Good to know.
> In most cases
> these are conflicts with very old versions of packages, sometimes
> from the pre-policy era.
Ah.
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
