On 05/08/09 at 14:16 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> (05/08/2009): > > Actually, the counter-argument is that we don't want to make it > > *harder* to do a QA upload. Currently, it's "apt-get source ; make > > change ; dput". If we used a VCS, we would have to create: - a process > > to auto-import orphaned packages into the VCS - procedures to commit > > changes to VCS before doing QA uploads > > > > I don't have numbers about that, but a fair share of QA uploads are done > > by one- or two-timers, even a majority of uploads is done by QA folks. > > We don't want to make it harder for those one-timers to improve the > > status of orphaned packages. > > Just to clarify, I meant moving collab-maint/foo.git to e.g. > collab-maint/orphaned/foo.git to make it obvious to folks browsing the > repository that it's orphaned, while retaining the history. Not > suggesting to put everything under $VCS. Sorry for the bad phrasing.
Do people actually browse the repository like that? I never do that. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
