On 03/02/10 at 16:47 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > As an alternative suggestion that just occurred to me, we can actually > define a new datatype for releases (as we did for package versions) > which is an enumeration sorted as we please. That way "<" ordering would > work automagically. I'm not sure it will be worth, though.
We had that in the past. The problem is that adding a release to the release type requires recreating all the tables that use that type, which is super-annoying, of course. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
