Hi Charles, On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:41:13PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > If the final result is extra work and confusion, how about adding a comment > that this field should be avoided for the moment ?
Sounds reasonable (same for Watch field). > In any case, the Homepage field of debian/control should have precedence. +1 I see your good intention to assemble data clearly related to upstream in one place but pragmatically we need to accept that our tools are not using the data at this place and unused data tend to bitrot. Since there would be a very easy migration path in case there might be some agreement to move the data to some other place which can be easily done by some automatic script, I would not recommend to use the Homepage and Watch field in debian/upstream/metadata. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140905094614.gh3...@an3as.eu