On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 00:21 +0200, q...@vienna.at wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:57:19AM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 13:24:33 +0200 > > From: Marcin Kulisz <deb...@kulisz.net> > > To: 825624-d...@bugs.debian.org > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) > > Rasbian is not mentioned in reportbug cause it's not Debian. > > You may notice: Ras(berry)&(De)bian and now everybody can see, it is Debian. > Right
No, it's derived from Debian. It is not produced by the Debian project. (Also "raspberry" and "raspbian".) > > It is a derivative maintained outside of Debian, > > This is not correct, Yes, it is. http://www.raspbian.org/RaspbianFAQ explicitly makes it clear that it is not an official port. > because Debian ist built for Intel, Amd and for ARM too. This makes no sense. The fact that Debian packages are built for some ARM targets and Raspbian targets a particular ARM-based(ish) device does not change the fact that Raspbian is a derivative that is not maintained by the Debian project. Regards, Adam
