On 16/01/18 09:41, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 15.01.2018 12:08, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> Hence my suggestion (to which I must add X-Debian-Package now): >> >> X-Debian: buildd.debian.org >> X-Debian-Package: firefox >> X-Debian-Architecture: powerpc >> X-Debian-Suite: sid >> X-Debian-State: failed >> >> I have just taught tracker.debian.org to recognize the above so you can >> immediately drop the setting of "X-Distro-Tracker*" provided that you set >> X-Debian to buildd.debian.org and X-Debian-Package to the source package >> name. > > I have added this now and I'll monitor throughout the day if it actually > works as expected. > > I didn't do pochu's suggestion of official/unofficial yet, mostly > because that list isn't technically known to the script and it seems we > already skip notifications for the following architectures: > > ignore_arches: mips64el hurd-i386 alpha hppa m68k powerpcspe ppc64 sh4 > sparc64 x32
Can we drop mips64el from that list? It's been a supported architecture for a while. > So a solution here would be to just mirror the actual list of > unsupported ports there, if we want that. But sending out new > notifications for these would be a big behavior change (i.e. by > definition it should only send out mails for supported ones). Makes sense. Those could be sent as well, but filtered by the tracker service to a different keyword, so the user can choose whether to subscribe to those or not. > I suppose the actual delta would be +kfreebsd-amd64 +kfreebsd-i386 +ia64 > +powerpc, right? Indeed. Cheers, Emilio