On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Daniel Marjamäki wrote: > I don't know what the "suitable destination and suitable format" > would be .. so feel free to suggest these.
I would suggest publishing them on the cppcheck website, then the tracker website can download the files you produce and integrate them into the page. The format can be anything you like as long as it is machine-readable. A JSON file with a list of packages where the link should show up would be ideal for this. If you would like a count of warnings/errors in the panel then you could make it a dict with the package name as the key and the count(s) as the values. > I would also like to be able to upload a list of "warnings that are > definitely not false positives". Such warnings could be shown in the > centre maybe? Sounds like a good idea. If you could output files with the cppcheck XML format for each package and provide a way to access to the whole lot, then the tracker site could periodically sync the results and display them. PS: have cppcheck folks considered supporting the firehose static analysis results format? https://github.com/fedora-static-analysis/firehose https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StaticAnalysis -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise