Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:57:54 +0800 with message-id <574179004a4f68c5b39200538b321fc1cb44cda3.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1052146: UDD: broken data from bugs-binpkgs-pts CGI script has caused the Debian Bug report #1052146, regarding UDD: broken data from bugs-binpkgs-pts CGI script to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1052146: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052146 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd The UDD list of BTS binary packages for the PTS started outputting some incorrect package names. I am not sure if these are caused by bad data in the BTS itself or if something has broken in the UDD database. $ curl -sL https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugs-binpkgs-pts.cgi | grep -vP '^(?:src:)?[-a-z0-9.+]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+$' 115.2.0esr-1 severity: 0 1 0 0 0 critical update 0 1 0 0 0 firefox-esr version: 0 1 0 0 0 ng/dl. debian 0 1 0 0 0 trixie's 0 1 0 0 0 -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWisesignature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 18:04:14 +1000 Stuart Prescott wrote: > I don't think the BTS or UDD are broken here, I think that's just > #1052073 which has some very interesting metadata that might take some > time to clean up... Thanks for the pointer. Fixed #1052073 with some BTS control commands. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWisesignature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---