On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:03:45PM -0500, Christopher Martin wrote: > To fix this, we'd need either to ship a kdmrc that conforms to the > kcontrol configurator's basic pattern, and so wouldn't be modified by > kcontrol more than is really necessary (could we make it keep the > comments, at least?), or else re-write the kdm module of kcontrol to > behave less stupidly, which would be quite an undertaking. > > Comments?
Perhaps this is a bug that would be useful forwarded upstream, hopefully the upstream authors just overlooked the fact that it mangles the config file and it is not a "feature". ;) Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
