On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:00:13PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote: > On Mittwoch, 3. September 2003 22:45, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > yes. gcj compiles them fine after you wield a bit of vi against > > acinclude.m4.in. kdebindings doesn't need libjvm.so or libhpi.so, > > so checking for those two files is kinda ridiculous way to verify a > > working jvm... > Can you make useful diffs and send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > with a description so things work out of the box when they are in kde ? Well yes, I already implemented it as a patch in debian/patches now that I reviewed it, looks like removing the checks isn't a generic solution. you still need to link against libhpi.so if you happen to use sun/blackdown/ibm jdk to compile. I need to refine the patch to work in both cases. And as a more worrying problem, I'm still tracking to make it compile nicely with qt 3.2 without pulling unecessary amounts of code from HEAD... -- Riku Voipio | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | kirkkonummentie 33 | +358 40 8476974 --+-- 02140 Espoo | | dark> A bad analogy is like leaky screwdriver |