Ben Burton writes: >> I've debugged this ...
> Ah, thanks. I had misunderstood the behaviour of > KProcess::DontCare. np. >> To be honest, konq-speaker source is pretty bad, if it doesn't even >> factor out common code in both plugins. > FWIW, I can understand the author not wanting to split out a shared > library for what is about 12 lines of common code in two very small > plugins. Okay, I didn't realise there was so little common code. But still, it's likely to get expanded ( software always is ;) ), and even if not putting it into a shared lib, a separate noinst_LTLIBRARY would still be a very good idea imho. > Anyway, thanks heaps for sorting that out. Now to make the patches > and upload. :) Have fun :) cheers domi