Martin Loschwitz writes: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 08:53:54AM -0400, Christopher Martin wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I had assumed that the lack of QT updates was a conscious choice by >> the KDE maintainers to hold off on uploading QT 3.3. But your >> message implies that this isn't really the case. >> > As far as I am concerned, KDE 3.2 is still not officially certified > for running with Qt 3.3, is it?
It is. On http://www.kde.org/info/requirements/3.2.php, it says "Qt >= 3.2.3". > Anyway, Qt 3.3 should not go into Sarge, I think. Why not ? It's been released for more than 4 months already, which means it's about the same age as KDE 3.2. cheers domi