Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On June 13, 2004 12:44, Brian Nelson wrote: >> For one, they're missing the qaccessible.h header. It appears to >> missing from the 3.2.3 packages as well. > > Martin, there seem to be a few other bugs open regarding missing files. > qvfbhdr.h is missing - #182366. tabwidget.png should also allegedly exist > - #195189. And someone raised a question over the location of headers > under /u/i/qt3, that I'm not qualified to answer fully, but thought I'd > mention - please see #226990. There are yet more reports on missing > headers, but these are the ones that are still relevant, from what I can > tell.
IMO, the reason for the missing files is the ridiculous number of superfluous packages Qt has been split into. Is it really necessary to have libqt3-mt-dev, libqt3-headers, libqt3-compat-headers, qt3-dev-tools, qt3-designer, qt3-apps-dev, qt3-linguist, qt3-assistant, qt3-qtconfig, qt3-dev-tools-embedded, qt3-dev-tools-compat, etc. (I think I even left some out!) in separate packages? Just a single -dev package seems sufficient to me. It makes me wonder what kind of a bribe it took to get this past the ftp-masters. -- You win again, gravity!