Your message dated Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:36:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line juk has problems with libFLAC4 1.1.1 (works with 1.1.0 from testing) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2004 12:11:18 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 14 05:11:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from altrade.nijmegen.internl.net [217.149.192.18] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C7C9W-0004vQ-00; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 05:11:18 -0700 Received: from 163-234.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net by altrade.nijmegen.internl.net via 163-234.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.234.163] with ESMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> id i8ECBFCw000600 (8.12.10/2.04); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:11:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: Jos Poortvliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: juk has problems with libFLAC4 1.1.1 (works with 1.1.0 from testing) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:11:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart47618509.aNFakmEdUb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --nextPart47618509.aNFakmEdUb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Package: juk Version: 3.3.0-1 Starting Juk gives the following error: juk: error while loading shared libraries: libFLAC.so.4: cannot open shared= =20 object file: No such file or directory After downgrading libFLAC4 to 1.1.0 from testing, it works fine. so juk doe= snt=20 seem to like libFLAC4 1.1.1. I also filed a bugreport to juk, I dunno what= =20 the source of the problem is: juk, libFLAC4, or the package(s). I am using Debian GNU/Linux unstable, kernel 2.6.8.1-ck7. Hope you can fix it, or forward this to the appropriate person. tnx for the work on packaging juk, its a great audio player! grtz Superstoned --nextPart47618509.aNFakmEdUb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBRt/kDPeW3YPqwxsRApRUAJ4+dzxkYKFLQjtIeQi6c8pw4gCiHACcC3ZA 0+5Dh61nFe99lzhgki+0zI0= =jwgj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart47618509.aNFakmEdUb-- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 271664-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2004 14:36:34 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 17 06:36:34 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-66-96.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.96] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CfJDd-0003K0-00; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 06:36:33 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CfJDb-0007jh-Ls for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:36:31 +0100 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:36:31 +0100 From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: juk has problems with libFLAC4 1.1.1 (works with 1.1.0 from testing) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: * Jos Poortvliet [Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:49:32 +0100]: > Well, juk works again, for me too (I haven't used it for some time, changed > to > amarok). and I can't find libFLAC4 1.1.1 either, altough the other libflac's > are 1.1.1... I might have been wrong, or libFLAC4 has been removed (could've > been a mistake) but I think its rather me :D ok, closing the bug. > wel, anyway, it works now, thanx for trying... > and tnx for KDE in debian :D > (will 3.3 make it for sarge???) > grtz > Jos > Op vrijdag 17 december 2004 03:50, schreef u: > > * Jos Poortvliet [Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:11:09 +0200]: > > > Package: juk > > > Version: 3.3.0-1 > > > Starting Juk gives the following error: > > > juk: error while loading shared libraries: libFLAC.so.4: cannot open > > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > > After downgrading libFLAC4 to 1.1.0 from testing, it works fine. so juk > > > doesnt seem to like libFLAC4 1.1.1. I also filed a bugreport to juk, I > > > dunno what the source of the problem is: juk, libFLAC4, or the > > > package(s). > > > I am using Debian GNU/Linux unstable, kernel 2.6.8.1-ck7. > > > Hope you can fix it, or forward this to the appropriate person. > > > tnx for the work on packaging juk, its a great audio player! > > uhm, can you confirm if this is already fixed? at least, I can't > > reproduce, plus I don't know where did that libFLAC4 1.1.1 come > > from... both sid an sarge have 1.1.0-11. > > thanks, -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. -- Josh Billings