On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 02:25:17PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > Based on the lack of opposition, it seems that the following is the consensus > for packaging .bdic files.
thanks for driving this silent resolution ahah :D > 1. The .bdic files should be compiled at package creation time. > 2. The .bdic files should be included in the existing Hunspell language > binary > packages. well, I can confirm these 2 points match my preference, so… > 3. The .bdic files should be installed in /usr/share/hunspell-bdic. … and I don't really have an opinion here. What I do want to see *before* we actually release a lo-dicts with these is something that actually reads and make use of them *first*. > At this point, the only question left is where this should be documented and > who should write the documentation. I am assuming that /usr/share/doc/ > dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html is the correct place for > documentation. I am willing to submit a PR if nobody else prefers to do so > instead. mh, what documentation are you talking about?? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature