John Hasler wrote: > Pino Toscano writes: >> I'm just curious to know: if you don't use the package, how can you express >> an >> opinion on it? > > I commented on the misuse of the term DRM to describe the advisory locking > that is the subject of this discussion. I added the parenthetical to make > it clear that I was not thereby endorsing the present arrangement. > > BTW "Settings->Configure Ocular" offers a "Obey DRM limitations" checkbox. > This will confuse many users as the feature seems to be normally referred > to as "securing" or "locking". To most people "DRM" has to do with music > and videos. > >> This for sure doesn't help about the current discussion. > > I just wanted to clarify the point that this advisory locking is not DRM.
You are quite correct on all of it. I didn't even think to look in that box to start with, because KDE's text referred to DRM, and where do you ever find a DRM disable box? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
