On Wednesday 15 January 2014 18:17:19 Wookey wrote: > Source: qt4-x11 > Version: 4.8.5 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertag: arm64 > > This package fails to build on arm64 without this patch. It is largely > based on the ubuntu patches in 4:4.8.4+dfsg-0ubuntu15, > 4:4.8.4+dfsg-0ubuntu17, and the important fix in > 4:4.8.4+dfsg-0ubuntu18), but has a few changes.
[snip] > 2) It uses linux-g++ PLATFORM and adds the -fpermissive CFLAG to enable > it to build rather than defining a new almost-identical > linux-g++-aarch64 PLATFORM because that seems to be unnecessary and less > clean. However I am no QT expert so there may be a good reason for doing > it the other way. I have left that definition file in so you can see > what was done, but so far as I can see the linux-g++ definitions are > correct. A look at why -fpermissive is needed might be a good thing, but > is beyond my ken. OK, I have taken a look at this. Indeed defining a new mkspec *just* for arm64 doesn't sounds right at all. WRT the fpermissive, well, I would need to see which errors are being triggered without that flag. Do you have an arm64 build log without - fpermissive at hand? Else, are you able to create one for seeing what's going on? = JIT stuff: except for the stuff in debian/rules, it is actually conflicting with other patches we are currently having in that respect: rejects in file src/3rdparty/webkit/Source/JavaScriptCore/wtf/Platform.h But I have modified those already so there is nothing to fear there, it's a simple matter of touching the current patches. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
