On Wednesday 12 March 2014 18:59:25 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Wednesday 12 March 2014 22:39:17 Helge Deller wrote: > > Hi Lisandro, > > > > On 03/12/2014 10:18 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > > We try our best to avoid any delta with upstream, both to get an > > > upstream > > > ACK both the patch to prevent possible problems and to avoid to let the > > > patch rotten in our repos. > > > > Fully understandable. > > > > > So the best path here is pushing it upstream :) > > > > Yes, sure. > > > > The only reason why I proposed that is, that each time when you push a new > > qt4 through the debian buildds, we are in trouble on hppa because I have > > to > > kill the build process manually and trigger Dave to build qt4 with his > > patch manually. > > > > If we forget this we will run into unresolved symbols with *all* our > > already built packages which depend on qt4 (e.g. all KDE apps). > > > > So, I'm just asking you to add it to your patch repo until we really can > > resolve it. > > This is fully understandable too. But if I lower the threshold for you, I > need to lower it for everyone, and then I get swamped on a myriad of > patches that I can't push upstream. > > The arm64 case might be a game changer if we can push 3rd party [0] BSD > patches directly, even if we need to get trough Lars each time. > > [0] Read this as "not wrote by the person pushing it to gerrit"
And by the way, going through gerrit sounds more like an inversion than a problem if you need to stop the buildd every time someone of the team pushed Qt :) -- 127.0.0.1 sweet 127.0.0.1 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/116226631.gtvochVpYl@luna
