The upstream uses this patch. https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,73290 and it has been merged.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:43 PM, YunQiang Su <wzss...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > <perezme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tuesday 08 October 2013 13:58:43 YunQiang Su wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer >>> >>> <perezme...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > On Monday 07 October 2013 09:32:12 YunQiang Su wrote: >>> >> Package: qtwebkit >>> >> Version: 2.2.1-6 >>> >> >>> >> On mips64el, qtwebkit has the same problem like qt4. >>> >> The attachment is the patch. >>> >> >>> >> Or where should I apply it to upstream? >>> > >>> > Hi YunQiang! As a rule of thumb, if it's something that does not involve >>> > packaging, pushing the patchs upstream is normally the best idea. An >>> > exception could be a patch that introduces something that is very >>> > Debian-related, but most of the time this can also be pushed upstream >>> > somehow. >>> >>> Thanks, I see. >>> I am wondering about which component should it involve to qt? >>> I have pushed this patch to qt/qt4/qtscripts. >> >> If the problem is in qtwebkit, then push it to qtwebkit. If in doubt, join >> upstream's irc #qt on freenode and ask. > As you noticed, I pushed it the qt4 in Qt's gerrit. > The new version of patch is > >> >> Kinds regards, Lisandro. >> >> -- >> >> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer >> http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ >> http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ > > > > -- > YunQiang Su -- Yunqiang Su -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAKcpw6Vu2h-5nY2GmQWgE5CfFP2uz6m8b=uyf6mbh2kyb86...@mail.gmail.com
