On dim., 2015-03-01 at 21:58 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > slim and lightdm do have native systemd .service files, but don't have > those relationships, which I think is probably a bug in those DMs' > service files; they should probably gain those lines too. However, > because they participate in managing the display-manager.service > symlink, they suppress gdm.service altogether, so they might avoid > get this problem with the plymouth handover.
So what's your advice here for lightdm? Maybe it's worth adding it, but it doesn't warrant a freeze exception? Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part