Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:59:23 -0300 with message-id <2136214.HW76YciMkZ@tonks> and subject line Re: Bug#825689: qtchooser should have a "Breaks" against libqt5core5a 5.6.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #825689, regarding qtchooser should have a "Breaks" against libqt5core5a 5.6.0+dfsg-1 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 825689: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825689 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: qtchooser Version: 58-gfab25f1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.3 Despite the problem is in libqt5core5a 5.6.0+dfsg-1, the rule is that qtchooser should have a "Breaks" against this package. The "affects" added in bug 825243 is unfortunately not sufficient to make the user aware of the bug because aptitude ignores it (see bug 825283). Moreover reportbug ignores it too (bug 544812). -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages qtchooser depends on: ii libc6 2.22-9 ii libgcc1 1:6.1.1-4 ii libstdc++6 6.1.1-4 qtchooser recommends no packages. qtchooser suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Considering that Qt 5.6.1 is already in unstable and that this was a bug only happening in experimental I'm closing it. -- ...man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much -- the wheel, New York, wars and so on -- whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man -- for precisely the same reasons. Douglas Adams, "The hitchhikers' guide to the galaxy" Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---