On 24/08/2017 18:45, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Sorry if it sounds harsh, but no, you are not entitled to do so. The sole fact that you don't understand the whole transition thing and you still complain is a key indicator.
I know what transition are. some are more prepared than others, that's the only point I complain.
Again, another reason that confirms what I wrote above. It's called unstable for a reason, users using unstable are expected to find this issues and be able to cope with them reporting *real* bugs. If you don't expect to see this then switch to testing.
When I finc bug in experimental or unstable before they it testing, on the other hand you are happy ;-) And I did find quite a few...
2) kde environment as a whole being maybe the most demanding qt test bench applications, it may had been useful to check hat kde is running fine *before* transitioning : reading FTBS bug opened, it appears that some essential kde package indeed have never been compiled with qt 5.9.1 (and current cmake but that's another story as it was done in //).Again, false. We did rebuild the key packages related to the transition. That's actually one of the reasons it took us that much time before uploading packages and asking for the transition slot.
There should not be FTBS related only to qt 5.9 then or the change were not commited ...
--eric
