Hi On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 08:28:34AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > El viernes, 4 de enero de 2019 07:10:09 -03 Bastian Blank escribió: > > Please don't re-use versions. > I understand that by: "if you uploaded 1.2.3-1 don't reupload 1.2.3-1, bu > better 1.2.3-2" Is that right? If it is: what's the problem? The package has > never reached the archive, so it virtually never existed. Except some tool > requires it :-/
We index our notes on packages by name+version, but we don't keep a full history. So while cleaning up my own notes I found a matching package and only a deep look showed that this is not longer the same. > > po/ca/* and others are LGPL 2.1 or 3, without generic or later clause, > > so "LGPL-2.1+ or LGPL-3+" is incorrect. > Fair, but does it *really* deserves a reject? The license is still dfsg > compliant and there is only one tiny little fix which can be fixed on the > next > upload. An accept + RC bug could also work here. For attributions we now tend to do that, but not for listing too broad licenses. Regards, Bastian -- Respect is a rational process -- McCoy, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3