Hi Lisandro, Many thanks for taking care of this!
Le ven. 7 févr. 2020 à 16:06, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer < perezme...@gmail.com> a écrit : > tag 950845 moreinfo > thanks > > Hi Denis! > > First of all, thanks for filing the bug. In this way is easier for us to > track > issues. > > Secondly: I'm keeping this bug open for now, even if it's already fixed in > testing/unstable, as I clearly see you need it solved in Debian stable. > > On 20/02/07 12:21, Denis Rouzaud wrote: > > Package: qtbase-default > > Version: 5.11.5 > > > > Flags cannot be created on scoped enums > > > > See issue: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-47652 > > > > This has been fixed in Qt 5.12 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/235284 > > In you [original mail] you say this bug needs to get solved in order to > use it > in QGIS. The fix is already in the archive in testing/unstable, only > stable is > still affected. So if you are requesting this change is (at least) because > of: > > - You are preparing binary uploads for Debian stable, possibly non-official > (Debian stable has qgis compiled against Qt 4). > Yes this is it. We are willing to increase the minimum Qt version to allow using scoped enums for flags (because it provides way better API documentation). Increasing to 5.12 but 5.11+fix on debian would be enough for us. It would be hard to justify not to support Buster (or to package Qt ourselves). > - You need to update qgis in stable (I doubt so, as per the above comment). > - You are preparing a backport. > > From a Qt point of view is indeed a rather important bug to be fixed, but > from a > Debian stable point of view is not so: > > - Code already in stable does not suffers from this: it's clearly working. > - The bug has been present since Qt 5.5. > I see this. The bug isn't that bad indeed, and explained above it's mainly for documentation purpose we're looking to have it fixed. > > I think it will be difficult to convince the stable release team to accept > the > patch if the use case is not directly involved in Debian itself. > > However I'll try to add the patch and try it myself on a stable system to > check > it does not breaks something obvious. For what I can tell from the patch it > shouldn't, but... > I understand that. In any case, thanks a lot for giving it some time. > > Whatever extra information you can provide us to justify the stable upload > would > certainly help. > > > [original mail] < > https://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2020/02/msg00055.html> > > > Regards, Lisandro. > Best wishes, Denis
