forwarded 902635 https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56264 tag 902635 - moreinfo tag 902635 - patch thanks
Hi John! On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 03:38, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > Control: reopen -1 > > On 2/26/20 1:09 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Hi! I'm closing this bug due to lack of response. Please feel free to > > reopen it or opening a new bug if you can provide us with more > > information as required. > > The issue has not been fixed. Closing a bug without fixing the issue > behind it makes no sense. Bug reports are supposed to document issues, > closing reports means hiding issues. Indeed my fault, this should have been not closed. Sorry for that. > The issue has not been properly addressed yet because it's fundamentally > difficult to fix. The bug is a result of an underlying design problem > which is a result of upstream ignoring that the upper 16 address bits > in a 64 bit physical address are reserved by Intel. > > However, they have actually understood the problem now and they are > planning to address the problem in the near future since x86_64 > and arm64 are expanding their virtual address spaces as well [1]. Great! > > [1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56264 > > -- > .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org > `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de > `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/