Hello, On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:24:29PM +0200, Stefan Huehner wrote: > at the moment there are 3 distinct ruby versions in the archive. > > - ruby1.6 > - ruby1.8 > - ruby1.9 (experimental) > > Is ruby1.6 needed in the archive? Or should be remaining users of > ruby1.6 be migrated to ruby1.8.
I clearly recall a discussion about this last year. Some efforts were made to port some remaining stuff to a newer Ruby, but I don't remember what the end result/conclusion was. Akira, Funitoshi... any idea? Paul -- Student @ Eindhoven | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
