>> But I intended to say that >> alternatives is not fit for that usage. >> >> If we proved ruby1.9.x packages and >> we use alternatives for all ruby1.9.x, >> we should check many packages. > > That could be a useful goal for squeeze.
squeeze includes only one Ruby 1.9 package. alternatives is not needed. My opinion: * package name of Ruby 1.9.1 shoud be "ruby1.9" (many ruby1.9.x packages and many /usr/bin/ruby1.9.x introduce unnecessary complexty.) * we should not use alternatives for /usr/bin/ruby1.* (we should have "standard ruby" or "standard ruby1.9".) -- ay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org