]] Jordon Bedwell > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> wrote: > > > ]] Praveen A > > > > > Should we comment out rubygems usage as a fallback option too? > > > > I don't think so, as long as the dependencies of the package pulls the > > library in, the code is never executed. > > > > require "rubygems" is a redundant task unless this library is being built > for >1.9.3 and even if people don't consider it expensive (and it's not > expensive in the grand scheme of things) it's just not needed unless you > are on old-ruby.
In the code sample Praveen posted, it's only require-d if we get a loaderror for the packaged version, hence dead code. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8738va4966....@xoog.err.no
