On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Per Andersson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would like to reach a consensus on libjs-jquery though, which is not > suggested even though the bundled jquery.js is replaced with a symlink > to /usr/share/javascript/jquery/jquery.js. This is because libjs-query > recommends javascript-common which in turn suggests > apache | lighttpd | http. If I have understood correctly, if suggests are > configured to install automatically, suggestions would be automatically > installed. This would install a lot of, probably unwanted, stuff > > My proposal for the relation between the generated docs bundled jquery.js > and libjs-jquery is to neither suggest nor recommend it, leaving it to the > user to figure it out if they want jquery enabled ruby documentation. The > motivation is that the pain for all the extra installed stuff is bigger than > the gain of being suggested to install libjs-jquery.
After further inspection it seems that it will not be possible to view the source code on the rdoc pages for a specific function if jquery is missing. For e.g. ruby-wikicloth this is almost the entire use case for the generated documentation. I imagine that this can be the case for lots of packages. -- Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CABYrXSSdXmk+OyBwWYyZsDg0GDtG25v6nn1=glkben2l5j7...@mail.gmail.com
