On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:56:27PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 30/01/16 19:18, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: [email protected] > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hi, > > > > We want to ship ruby2.3 in stretch, so we must start the transition now. > > The Ruby transitions are done in phases, as described in > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/InterpreterTransitions > > > > We are now in phase 1: I have just uploaded ruby-defaults enabling > > builds against ruby2.3 (besides ruby2.2) to experimental, and we will > > start test rebuilds ASAP. I am filing this bug now to keep this > > transition under the radar of both the Release and Ruby teams. > > > > Ben file: > > > > title = "ruby2.3"; > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libruby2.2" | .depends ~ "libruby2.3"; > > is_good = .depends ~ "libruby2.3"; > > is_bad = ! .depends ~ "libruby2.3"; > > > > Note about the ben file statements above: at this stage, packages will > > gain ruby2.3 support but won't lose support for ruby2.2, so "bad" > > packages are indeed just the ones that don't have ruby2.3 support yet. > > > > I will let you know when we are ready to begin rebuilds on unstable, but > > before even uploading ruby-defaults enabling ruby2.3 builds there. > > OK. > > I have created a tracker for you at: > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.3.html
I would like to add support for building for ruby2.3 in unstable. That
means uploading the version of ruby-defaults in experimental to
unstable.
The number of FTBFS in arch:any packages against ruby2.3 support is fairly
small:
libguestfs
remctl
ruby-blockenspiel
ruby-fssm
ruby-gsl
ruby-kakasi-ffi
ruby-monkey-lib
ruby-mysql2
ruby-oj
ruby-rjb
ruby-zoom
zeroc-ice
I'll make sure to report bugs against those packages before uploading
ruby-defaults. Once ruby-defaults is uploaded, I already have a list of
packages to binNMU.
Also, could you please drop the "lib" prefixes from the ben file? I
noted that some packages depend directly on the interpreter packages
("rubyX.Y"), so we also need to track those.
For the Ruby team: I am tracking these rebuilds at
https://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/rebuilds/ruby2.3/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
