Hi Georg, On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 18:34 +0200, Georg Faerber wrote: > > On 18-04-06 17:14:57, John Leach wrote: > > I noticed that debian's ruby2.5_2.5.1.orig.tar.gz (sha1 > > e95ff19092f2026b161e6e6d7759489d646e10aa) differs from the actual > > upstream ruby 2.5.1 release tarball > > (93fafd57a724974b951957c522cdc4478a6bdc2e) > > > > The only difference is some gems removed from the Debian tarball: > > > > $ diff -ur upstream-orig/ debian-orig/ > > Only in upstream/ext/fiddle: libffi-3.2.1 > > Only in upstream/gems: did_you_mean-1.2.0 > > Only in upstream/gems: did_you_mean-1.2.0.gem > > Only in upstream/gems: minitest-5.10.3 > > Only in upstream/gems: minitest-5.10.3.gem > > Only in upstream/gems: net-telnet-0.1.1 > > Only in upstream/gems: net-telnet-0.1.1.gem > > Only in upstream/gems: power_assert-1.1.1 > > Only in upstream/gems: power_assert-1.1.1.gem > > Only in upstream/gems: rake-12.3.0 > > Only in upstream/gems: rake-12.3.0.gem > > Only in upstream/gems: test-unit-3.2.7 > > Only in upstream/gems: test-unit-3.2.7.gem > > Only in upstream/gems: xmlrpc-0.3.0 > > Only in upstream/gems: xmlrpc-0.3.0.gem > > > > Is this expected? It was a bit surprising to me to find that the > > included orig tarball wasn't exactly the one from upstream. > > Yes, see [1]. > > Cheers, > Georg > > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby/blob/master/debian/copyri > ght#L4
ok, thanks for the clarification! John.
