El vie., 13 mar. 2020 20:22, Lucas Kanashiro <kanash...@debian.org>
escribió:
> Hi David,
>
> On 13/03/2020 14:54, David Suarez wrote:
> > Im lost here...
> >
> > One of the decisions of removing, for example all the functionality of
> > aws-sdk-v{1,2} in favor of having only aws-sdk-s3, is because ruby
> > team is packaging gems for ruby webapps, not for endusers (as utkarsh
> > commented some time ago in is favor)
>
> We do maintain gems thinking on web apps in general, however, we do not
> arbitrarily remove them after they are in the archive.
>
Then someone have to update the team page.
I always packages ruby gems for end-users.
> Have ruby team any politics about why endusers would lost
> > functionality because another app packaging?
> We just agreed today as a team that we will just remove broken packages,
> if a package is not used anymore by a web app but it is still working
> fine we just keep them in the archive. But web apps drive our development.
>
> Regarding ruby-aws-sdk I suggest you to communicate better with the
> other team members, we are here to support our users but there are some
> trade-offs that need to be taken in account.
>
