Hi Drew, Le 02/03/2020 à 17:33, Drew Parsons a écrit : >> Like you, I would keep h5py_serial and h5py_mpi separate rather than >> submodules of h5py. Mostly because the h5py folks could in the future >> want to use those two names and do it in an incompatible manner. > > Fair enough, I'll keep them separate. (actually, I'll file an Issue > upstream and let them know what we've done. They may want to adapt for > themselves).
Actually, it may be wise to choose names that a) are clearly private, so people know they should not start using explicitly h5py_serial or h5py_mpi; b) will not clash with anything upstream may adopt in the future, a bit like choosing a debian-specific soname for shared library. why not _debian_h5py_serial and _debian_h5py_mpi? Feel free to disregard this suggestion or choose something else as you see fit. Just my 2c to avoid future headaches. Regards, Thibaut.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
