+----------------------+ | REJECT reasoning | +----------------------+
One of our trainees noticed that many files in the project seems to be GPL-3+ not GPL-3, and that d/c fails to mention one of the copyright holders on very many of the files, CWI, Amsterdam. +----------------------+ | Other comments | +----------------------+ Looks like the rapidxml is dual-licensed, but d/copyright only mentions MIT. The license for the autotools files is not plain GPL-3, but GPL-3+ plus a special exception. +----------------------+ | N.B. | +----------------------+ This review may not be exhaustive. Please check your source package against your d/copyright and the ftpmaster REJECT-FAQ, throughly, before uploading to NEW again. Thank you for your time and contribution! Sean === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
