On 2021-03-08 12:07, Drew Parsons wrote:
...
If libpetsc-complex3.14-dev is uninstalling cleanly as intended then
why would libpetsc64-complex3.14-dev not be doing the same?
Likewise, libpetsc64-complex3.14-dev should be behaving the same as
libpetsc64-real3.14-dev. Why is this problem only occuring with
libpetsc64-complex3.14-dev ?
If anyone can spot the difference then I'll be happy for the help.
I think I see it now
libpetsc64-complex3.14-dev.prerm sets
PETSC64_NAME=petsc${PETSC_SONAME_VERSION}
instead of
PETSC64_NAME=petsc64-${PETSC_SONAME_VERSION}
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
