G'day, This was resolved a year ago: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/2021-February/090093.html
Did an incorrect tarball get analyzed/uploaded or something? 'cause https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/hfst has the correctly licensed code, and has had that since 2021-02-13. -- Tino Didriksen On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 11:00, Thorsten Alteholz < [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > our hardworking trainees added a note to your package: > > - back-ends/foma/cpp-version/apply.cc mentions GNU General Public License > version 2 > but d/c mentions License: Apache-2.0 > > same for coaccessible.cc and many other. See Comment in the matching d/c > stanza. I went to that page and found nothing. > > The back-ends/foma/COPYING is GPL-2.0+. The README file confirms this. > > So I guess the change to Apache-2.0 is for one future version. For this > version, d/c is erroneous. > > - back-ends/foma/cpp-version/regex.cc is Copyright (C) 1984, 1989-1990, > 2000-2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc., but d/c does not mention it. > > same for back-ends/foma/regex.[ch] > > - files in back-ends/sfst/* have no copyright notice nor license notice and > there is no COPYING or LICENSE file in the directory. > > - libhfst/src/parsers/ contains files that are either GPL3 or LGPL3+ and > the > COPYING file says LGPL3 (not +) > > - scripts/windows/inttypes.h is not listed in d/c > > > > > Thorsten > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. > > > -- > debian-science-maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers >
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
