On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:36:22PM +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote: > On 04/28/2014 01:12 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:47:29AM +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote: > >> Hi Bill, > >> > >> my reasoning was that the executable is rather useless without the > >> documentation, which is non-free (pdf without the tex source). > > I do not understand: byt this reasonning, this package being a C library > > without documentation, which is not used by any other packages in Debian, is > > completly useless. > > It is needed for Sage...
As long as ratpoints is included in Debian, ratpoints users should be able to use the Debian package even if they do not use SAGE. > > At least the binary has a --help options. > > > > Did you already ask Michael Stoll if he had the TeX source ? > > Yes, but maybe I should ask another time. Well, I just did (I know him well). Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
