Hi Toby,

as far as I know Andreas Tille proposed a nice and really necessary tool
to exclude and repack source tarballs [1], [2] (CC-ing him). But, it seems,
it is not yet in uscan (sorry, I may be wrong).

I would also strongly recommend you to implement autotests using DEP-8 [3].
An example for python packages you can find here [4], [5]. Then your package
will regularly be tested.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/UscanEnhancements
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/685506
[3] 
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git;a=blob_plain;f=doc/README.package-tests;hb=HEAD
[4] 
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/minieigen.git;a=tree;f=debian/tests;h=b9795fefdb5a539fb17fa343e9da4102a45fb15d;hb=HEAD
[5] 
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/getfem.git;a=tree;f=debian/tests;h=ef37721692b98161ccffad57907a2c040e86f0fb;hb=HEAD

Regards

Anton


2014-05-06 0:08 GMT+02:00 Toby St Clere Smithe <tsmi...@ubuntu.com>:
> Hi Anton,
>
> further to the discussion earlier, over the next days I'm going to
> collect together a couple of bug fixes, make a new upstream release, and
> also do the repackaging. Then would you be happy to sponsor a new
> upload?
>
> Also, I would still like to learn more about this new tool that you and
> Thorsten mentioned, if you have a link to some reading :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Toby St Clere Smithe
> http://tsmithe.net
>

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Reply via email to