Hi there, I agree that there's no point maintaining two packages with the same contents :-) I've just installed texlive-luasseq to check and, yep, these are definitely the same. Was luasseq (2) added to texlive-luatex vaguely recently? I'm reasonably sure the code wasn't packaged when I made the package in the first place (or, at least, I hope it wasn't...)
Anyway, it also seems a little silly to have the spectral sequence code in luasseq sitting out on its own for no good reason, so I vote for replacing luasseq with the transitional package. I don't know much about this process, and I'm not a DD, so I suspect that I'll be spectacularly inefficient at making it happen. If it's a 10 minute job for you, please feel free to make an upload that turns luasseq into a transitional package. If it's more work, let me know and I'll roll up the required package (and maybe you could sponsor the upload that would be needed afterwards?) Finally, sorry for the slightly slow reply. I'll be quicker off the mark From now: would be very embarrassing to end up missing the Jessie freeze date! Rupert
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
