Package: apophenia Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks
Right, hello, maintainers! Thanks for all your work, This work is licensed under the GPLv2. At least, it tries to. COPYING2 contains a further restriction on distribution that results in a work that is *not* distributable, since the headers say v2 (not v2 or later) with these changes (the GPLv3 lets us remove further restrictions) I question if a lawyer was behind these changes, and I also question the validity of this license, and as a result, I question the distributablity. Could you please ask upstream to either pick AGPL, LGPL or GPL? It seems like the author wants to use the GPL, but the first part of COPYING2 wants to be AGPL, and the second wants to be LGPL. Thanks! Paul
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
