On 2015-08-13 Daniel Stender <deb...@danielstender.com> wrote: > We have a SONAME bump happening due to the Vigra 1.10.0 transition > [1] which generally could let spare a "v5" package when the two > transitions would be combined, isn't it?
> However, I think it's better to adopt what has been already changed > for 1.10.0+dfsg-9ubuntu1 to update Vigra for 15.10 (renaming > libvigraimpex5 to libvigraimpexv5 and rebuild) - there's really no > need to avoid this. I think that is sensible., too. > We have some other serious issues open for Vigra (with the Lenna > image set [2] and test suite problems in Mips), so I suggest we do > it that way: I'm going to prepare a "v5" 1.9.0+dfsg-11 for unstable > in the next days and check the reverse deps. After that we go for a > "v5" 1.10.0+dfsg-10 in experimental and check the reverse deps on > that, that would close the stdc++6 transition as the next thing to > do on Vigra. [...] I would suggest to make a "v5" for /experimental/ ASAP to minimize delay due to new processing. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
