Hi! > ... If there is a > package providing something and we allow a package of that name in that > is something completely different, then Debian would turn inconsistent. > Somewhere we apparently lost that email to the ftpmasters that informs > them about this name conflict, once we had become aware of it. Thinking > back, I possibly should have been more explicit and have suggested to > ask the ftpmasters to upfront reject the package to allow its > resubmission under a unique name. Hm. Right. I think this is what I > would do now :)
What about renaming it to "fpga-icestorm"? Will we have to "NEW"-wait 2-8 weeks again, or will it be prioritized because of just a renaming? Maybe we can upload 'arachne-pnr' just afterwards then? It's just important that 'fpga-icestorm' gets accepted into sid first, since arachne-pnr build-depends on it. Can we keep /usr/share/icestorm to be "upstream compatible"? Regards, Ruben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
