On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT <calcu...@rezozer.net> wrote: > It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense > to say so. > For a least two reasons: > 1] ` ./debian/rules get-orig-source ' gives the one in the git; > 2] the one in the archive is certainly derive from the git itself. > > Do I miss something here ? > What is the best way to fix this ?
I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd version of the orig.tar.xz. I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?). So yes, the faulty one is in the archive. The uploader of your package should have used 'pristine-tar checkout' instead of running the get-orig-source rule. Unless there is something wrong with the version in the archive (have you compared the files?), I suggest deleting normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.id and normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.delta from the pristine-tar branch and running 'gbp import-orig' on the version that in the archive. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
