I tested this patch. It works well for mips64el.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:40 AM, YunQiang Su <wzss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is the relevant portion of the proposed patch:
>>
>>> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64el)
>>> DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mno-altivec
>>> +DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mno-altivec
>>> +endif
>>> +# Build without Altivec to prevent FTBFS on ppc64el.
>>> +ifneq (,$(filter mips64%el mips64%el,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)))
>>> +DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mxgot
>>> +DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mxgot
>>> endif
>>
>> But the explanation is:
>>
>>> filter mips%64 mips%64el,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)
>>> is due to we may has some other mips64 architectures in future,
>>> for example: mips64r6{el}.
>>
>> The filter string differs between the patch and explanation:
>
> The patch is correct.
>
> Sorry for it.
>
>>
>> filter mips64%el mips64%el
>>
>> and
>>
>> filter mips%64 mips%64el.
>>
>> One is twice the same (typo?), the other has the percent sign placed
>> differently.
>>
>> Please confirm the correct filter command, otherwise I cannot apply this
>> patch.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ghis
>
>
>
> --
> YunQiang Su
--
YunQiang Su
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
