Hi, >I am aware s390x is failing. I have been trying to port it, and it no longer >segfaults (thanks to the pexport-endian.diff patch from upstream), but one >part of the >build step (the compiler bootstrapping itself) exits with code 1, >without printing anything. That’s on my list of things to talk to upstream >about.
I'm not sure I can help here... for sure you have to patch configure.ac, but other than that some code might be needed aswell. >x32 fails because there’s some hand-written assembly that isn’t aware of x32 >(it assumes i386 and amd64 are the only two cases). ok >Interestingly armel has failed a test case for floating-point (funnily enough >I had just that test failed when I was testing ppc64el and it turned out to be >a bug >in qemu!), so I’ll need to look into that. Previous uploads weren’t >running the tests as part of the build, so I don’t know if this is a >regression or not. armhf >has built successfully though... ok (I'll point you to a solution if possible) >I’m currently a student, so one package is more than enough, although >certainly one day I would consider applying to be a Debian Maintainer. Having >said that, for >a package in debian-science, there’s hardly any inconvenience >on my part. wonderful :) BTW you can apply as DM also if you want to maintain only one package, assuming you will in the future try to be more involved :) cheers, G. > On 24 Jan 2016, at 20:10, Gianfranco Costamagna > <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> wrote: > > Sure, thanks for the kind words for the former maintainers :) > > Btw s390x and x32 just failed to build, you might want to poke upstream about > a porting, and ping me about testing patches on porter boxes :) > > If you want ti maintain some other packages you might even consider applying > for Debian Contributor or Debian Maintainer, you are doing a good job here, > you might even have direct upload privileges one day for this package :) > > Cheers, > > G. > -------------------------------------------- > Dom 24/1/16, James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> ha scritto: > > Oggetto: Re: polyml 5.5.2-4 > A: "Gianfranco Costamagna" <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> > Cc: "Debian Science Team" > <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>, "Lionel Elie Mamane" > <lio...@mamane.lu>, "Achim D. Brucker" <adbruc...@0x5f.org> > Data: Domenica 24 gennaio 2016, 20:47 > > Oh right, I wasn’t > aware such a thing was the done thing; I was just using > xindy (just so happened to see that someone took over > maintenance of it on debian-devel) as a reference. Of course > it goes without saying that I’m grateful for all the work > Lionel and Achim have done on it; I hope nobody thinks > otherwise. Without them there would be no Poly/ML package on > Debian and its derivatives. > > Thanks for continuing to sponsor me! > > Regards, > James > >> > On 24 Jan 2016, at 19:41, Gianfranco Costamagna > <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> > wrote: >> >> I uploaded > it a few seconds ago, hopefully it will appear before the > next dinstall >> (due in 12 minutes), and > then start building everywhere. >> >> BTW nitpick, usually on changelog when a > person takes over a package maintenance >> > is used to say somthing like >> "take > over the package maintenance >> - thanks > Lionel, and Achim for your work!" >> > >> and then upload :) >> >> anyway, thanks to > you both for your work, and James, keep up the nice work! >> (as you did in the last three uploads) >> >> cheers, >> >> Gianfranco >> >> >> >> >> >> Il Domenica 24 > Gennaio 2016 20:38, James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> > ha scritto: >> Hi Gianfranco (cc’d > Lionel and Achim as this upload officially makes me > uploader), >> Many thanks; I’ll push the > changes to debian-science/polyml.git. >> > >> Regards, >> James >> >> >>> On 24 Jan 2016, at 19:36, Gianfranco > Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> > wrote: >>> >>> > Signed&Uploading in a few minutes! >>> >>> thanks for > your contribution to Debian! >>> >>> cheers, >>> >>> Gianfranco >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Il Domenica 24 Gennaio 2016 14:54, > James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> > ha scritto: >>> Hi Gianfranco, >>> >>>> 1) you > took over the package maintenance, can I see a post where > the current uploaders acked the change? >>> >>> Please see > the entirety of this thread in debian-science: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2016/01/msg00035.html >>> >>>> 2) a > patch against testsuite not mentioned in changelog >>>> 3) patches against mips* not > mentioned in changelog. >>>> >>>> basically I would change changelog > mentioning the patch name, e.g. >>>> > new patches: >>>> foo.diff: add > support for foo architecture >>>> > >>>> and so on. >>>> the patches should be good :) >>> >>> I have > amended the changelog and re-uploaded to mentors; how is it > now? >>> >>> > Thanks, >>> >>> > James -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
