Hi Maximiliano, Sylvestre, Le lundi 29 février 2016 à 10:24 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : > Le 29/02/2016 à 09:54, Maximiliano Curia a écrit : > > > > Control: block 816260 by 749833 > > > > Hi, > > > > As a request from the release team I have removed the dependency of scilab > > from cantor, I'm adding this block to the corresponding bug in cantor as > > way > > to remember to reenable the backend once the problem is fixed. > > > > Also, since there is a patch available upstream that's being stale for > > review > > for sometime now, wouldn't it be feasible to upload a patched scilab to > > experimental as a way to gather some testers/reviewers? > > > > Happy hacking, > Clément, François, could you help here? > Thanks > > Sylvestre
The current patch on the codereview is incomplete and will not provide a decent implementation for now. You can provide a patched version for the 5.x family to iterate on the current patch implementation. We will be happy to help you rebasing / validating it ! To conforms to the open-source licence, the problematic files will be removed before the 6.0.0 release. And the functionality will be present by either using a scilab implementation (eg. based on the patchset) or RpolyPlusPlus [1] . [1]: https://github.com/sweeneychris/RpolyPlusPlus -- Clément -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
