On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 19:59 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > [Adding debian-wb-team back to Cc] > > On 13/03/16 17:56, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 17:35 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > > > > On 13/03/16 16:34, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > > > What would make mipsel different to other architectures or from the > > earlier successful mipsel build? It's the same petsc. > petsc may be at the same version, but the environment has changed. > It may be a bug in another package (e.g. an rdep) or a bug in petsc > that was latent until now. > > > > > > > Have you checked if it builds fine on a porterbox? > > I tried but sbuild wouldn't work inside the schroot environment on > > etler. > Did you read the MOTD? See https://dsa.debian.org/doc/schroot/
I missed that. I'll add it to my bookmarks. > Anyway given the build queue is currently empty on mipsel, I've given > it back. > Let's see if the problem is fixed now... Thanks for that. It's showing a very different build failure now, as if something is wrong with mpi (openmpi). I'll follow those schroot instructions and look directly. Drew -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers