* Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> [2016-10-19 10:40]: > I see. This is the upstream packaging with only very minor modifications by > Jochen (liblti-dev is not packaged yet either, so it got removed from B-D).
Yeah, that was only a quick shot to try some stuff. Feel free to rework it. > The question remains, what to do about the different naming bfl (ROS) versus > orocos-bfl (upstream). Probably ROS packages using it would have to try > detecting one of them with cmake and fall back onto the other if it wasn't > found. As the ROS version is clearly just an outdated version of the Orocos upstream, I would go with Orocos and send patches to the depending projects. Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
