On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:36:52 +0200 (CEST) Pierre Saramito <pierre.saram i...@imag.fr> wrote: > Source: mumps > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Adam, > > It would be nice to have libmumps-metis-dev and libmumps-parmetis-dev > as alternatives to and libmumps-ptscotch-dev packages: > please, could you package mumps with (par)metis also ? >
Hi Pierre, I'm preparing an update to mumps 5.1. I'm following upstream's new debian template, which builds both scotch and metis at the same time. This means libmumps-scotch-dev will have both scotch and metis support (similarly in the parallel version). Is this useful to you or would we be better to generate a strictly new separate package? Drew -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
